Xano vs Adalo

Xano and Adalo are both platforms that cater to the no-code development landscape but serve different purposes. Xano is primarily a backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platform focused on API creation and database management, while Adalo is a no-code platform aimed at enabling users to build mobile and web applications with a visual interface.

Speak to an expert

1. Target Audience and Use Cases

Xano:

  • Backend Developers and Non-Developers: Appeals to those looking to create robust backend solutions without code, including developers needing quick API access.
  • API and Database Management: Best suited for users who need to handle complex data relationships and create scalable APIs for their applications.

Adalo:

  • Non-Technical Users: Designed for individuals without programming skills who want to create fully functional applications quickly and easily.
  • Mobile and Web App Development: Ideal for building visually appealing mobile and web apps without needing extensive technical knowledge.

Verdict: Xano is more suited for backend development and API management, while Adalo is focused on front-end app creation.

2. Ease of Use

Xano:

  • User-Friendly Interface: While it provides a straightforward interface for managing data and creating APIs, users may still benefit from some technical knowledge.
  • Focused on Backend Logic: Primarily targets users looking to streamline backend processes, which may not be intuitive for those solely focused on app design.

Adalo:

  • Visual Development Environment: Offers a drag-and-drop interface, making it easy for users to design and build applications without any coding knowledge.
  • Quick App Prototyping: Users can rapidly create prototypes and functional apps, making it suitable for MVPs and startups.

Verdict: Adalo is more intuitive for users focusing on app design, while Xano may require a bit more technical understanding for backend operations.

3. Design and Customization

Xano:

  • No Frontend Design Features: Lacks built-in tools for designing user interfaces, focusing solely on backend capabilities.
  • API Customization: Users can create and customize APIs extensively, but will need to integrate it with a separate frontend design tool.

Adalo:

  • Robust Design Features: Provides a wide range of components, templates, and customization options for creating user interfaces.
  • Responsive Design: Users can create apps that look good on both mobile and web platforms, with a focus on user experience.

Verdict: Adalo excels in UI/UX design, while Xano is strictly for backend functionalities.

4. Backend and Database Management

Xano:

  • Comprehensive Backend Services: Users can build databases, manage data relationships, and create business logic without coding.
  • Automated API Generation: Automatically generates RESTful APIs, making it easy to integrate with various frontend applications.

Adalo:

  • Integrated Database: Offers built-in database capabilities that allow users to manage data directly within the platform.
  • Limited Backend Flexibility: While it allows for some backend logic, it may not provide the depth and customization that Xano offers.

Verdict: Xano is superior for those needing advanced backend services, while Adalo is better for simpler applications with integrated data management.

5. Performance and Scalability

Xano:

  • Scalable Backend Solution: Designed to handle complex data relationships and API requests efficiently, making it suitable for applications with high data demands.
  • Optimized API Performance: Provides tools and features to optimize performance, ensuring fast response times.

Adalo:

  • Performance Limitations: While suitable for small to medium-sized applications, performance may be an issue with larger datasets or highly complex applications.
  • Basic Scalability: Offers some scalability but may not match Xano’s capabilities for enterprise-level applications.

Verdict: Xano is the better choice for performance and scalability, especially for data-intensive applications.

6. Integrations and Extensibility

Xano:

  • API Integration: Easily integrates with other services via APIs, allowing for flexible data exchanges with frontend applications.
  • Custom Code Option: Users can extend functionalities with custom code, providing greater control over backend processes.

Adalo:

  • Limited Third-Party Integrations: While it allows some integration with external services, the range is more limited compared to Xano.
  • Basic Customization Options: Users can create custom actions, but the extent of extensibility may not match what Xano offers.

Verdict: Xano provides superior integration capabilities, making it more flexible for developers.

7. Pricing

Xano:

  • Tiered Pricing Model: Offers a free tier with limited capabilities; paid plans start at around $49/month, depending on usage and features.
  • Usage-Based Pricing: Pricing scales according to API calls and database usage, making it suitable for various project sizes.

Adalo:

  • Affordable Plans: Offers a free plan with basic features, and paid plans start around $50/month for more advanced capabilities.
  • Flat Rate for Features: Generally offers a more predictable pricing structure compared to Xano’s usage-based model.

Verdict: Adalo is more affordable for users focused solely on app development, while Xano provides value for those needing advanced backend services.

Final Verdict

  • Choose Xano if you require a robust backend solution for creating APIs and managing databases efficiently, especially for data-intensive applications.
  • Choose Adalo if you want to quickly design and build visually appealing mobile or web applications without any coding experience.

In summary, Xano excels in backend API and database management, making it ideal for developers and businesses needing backend solutions. In contrast, Adalo provides a user-friendly platform for building mobile and web applications with a strong focus on design and user experience.

Pushing No-Code to Its Limits

Launching an app has never been more cost-effective and time-efficient. Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow have transformed the development landscape, enabling developers to create sophisticated applications rapidly.

Fast and Cost-Effective Launch

No-code platforms empower startups to launch their apps at lightning speed—often multiple times faster than traditional development—at a fraction of the cost. This agile approach helps startups focus on growth and innovation rather than high upfront development expenses.

Agile Iteration

For early-stage startups, quickly reaching a problem-solution fit is critical. No-code platforms allow rapid adaptation, letting you implement and push new features live in a matter of hours, not weeks. This flexibility means you can stay responsive to market needs and iterate on your product with ease.

Seamless Integration and Plugins

Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow come with built-in integrations and a wealth of plugins, giving you instant access to essential features and functionalities. Whether you're building a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) or scaling up, these platforms make it easy to connect with tools you need, from payments to analytics.

Version Control Made Simple

Launching new versions of your app has never been easier. No-code platforms provide flexible version control, enabling you to create save points, roll back to previous versions if needed, and experiment confidently

Geo George: Leading the No-Code Frontier

While no-code development can have limitations in performance and certain functionalities, Mayfly Ventures, led by CTO Geo George, is pushing past these boundaries. We specialise in building high-performance, highly scalable MVPs with advanced features, deep integrations, and native user experiences that feel polished and professional.

Geo has been at the forefront of low-code development, becoming one of the earliest adopters of Bubble.io in Australia. Over the past six years, he’s honed his expertise in low-code and no-code capabilities, training the Mayfly team to push these platforms to their full potential.

Book a free Growth Strategy Call

Geo

Startup mentor, product strategist, no-code wiz and PMF expert. Eclectic dance style.

Founding Partner

MUCUDU: deep integrations and AI wrapped in low code

Mayfly collaborated with the MUCUDU team to build a low-code MVP for their hospitality tech platform, which includes loyalty management, peer-to-peer monetary gifting, and Tab functionality. Beyond the standard integrations with Stripe, Apple, and Google for login and payments, we incorporated advanced integrations with Point of Sale systems like Doshii and AI-driven recommendations that personalize the dining experience.

With Mayfly Ventures, you get the speed and cost benefits of no-code, combined with the performance and functionality typically reserved for full-stack development.

VOLI Case Study: No-Code in Action

Before working with Mayfly, VOLI’s founder Charlie Crozier had approached 12 different development agencies. As a non-technical founder, Charlie struggled to get his app built and ready for users, with quotes ranging from $300,000 to $1 million. These high costs placed immense pressure on early capital raising.

“When we met Mayfly, both our budget and timeline were completely reevaluated. We were able to go to market at a fraction of the cost and time we had expected—without compromising on quality.”

—  Charlie Crozier, Founder

The Process:

Mayfly worked closely with VOLI through a series of workshops to deeply understand the product, its vision, and user needs. Leveraging no-code and low-code frameworks, we built an enterprise-grade app at a fraction of the cost quoted by other studios. Now in pilot testing, VOLI is preparing for release to 10 companies already on the waitlist.

Explore More Case Studies

Are you tackling a problem worth solving?

Let's chat opportunity!

Book a free Growth Strategy Call

No-Code Tools We Love

We use state of the art low code tools and push them to the limit to create performant, scalable, highly functional mobile web apps.

Bubble.io

A powerful no-code platform that lets you build fully functional web applications with drag-and-drop ease. Its flexibility allows you to design, develop, and launch complex apps quickly, without writing a single line of code.

Flutterflow

A platform designed for building mobile apps using Google’s Flutter framework, Flutterflow simplifies the development process while offering extensive customization, making it a go-to tool for responsive, high-performance mobile applications.

Xano

A no-code backend platform that gives you the tools to manage your database, set up APIs, and create scalable back-end solutions, all without the need for server-side programming knowledge.

Learn More About No-Code

Would you like a free product strategy call?

Let's chat opportunity!

Get in Touch

Get the Mayfly Way Template

Validate your idea, find your market, design feature sets and define your tech stack all with this free easy to use notion template.

Read our Blog

We talk about #no code #MVPs #product strategy #product market fit #fuck ups #founder stories