FlutterFlow vs Xano

FlutterFlow and Xano are two popular platforms in the no-code/low-code space, but they focus on different aspects of application development. FlutterFlow is a visual app builder designed for creating mobile and web apps using Flutter, Google's UI toolkit. On the other hand, Xano focuses on being a backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platform that provides a scalable and serverless backend for web and mobile applications, including database management, API creation, and cloud hosting.

Speak to an expert

1. Target Audience and Use Cases

FlutterFlow:

  • Startups and Developers: FlutterFlow is designed for startups, entrepreneurs, and developers who want to build mobile and web applications using Flutter, without needing to write extensive code.
  • App Designers and UI/UX Experts: The platform provides a visual drag-and-drop editor, allowing designers to create rich user interfaces quickly.
  • Prototypes and Full-Scale Apps: FlutterFlow is suitable for building prototypes and production-ready applications, especially those with complex front-end needs.

Xano:

  • Developers and Backend Engineers: Xano is designed for developers who need a powerful backend without the hassle of managing servers or infrastructure.
  • API-Driven Apps: Xano is ideal for building backend APIs that can serve data to any frontend (web, mobile, or desktop apps).
  • Database-Heavy Applications: Xano excels in handling data management, complex business logic, and server-side workflows.

Verdict: FlutterFlow is best for users focused on building front-end mobile or web apps, while Xano is aimed at developers who need to create a scalable and customizable backend for any app.

2. Ease of Use

FlutterFlow:

  • Drag-and-Drop Interface: FlutterFlow offers an intuitive interface for designing apps visually without the need for coding.
  • Integrated Flutter Code: While it’s no-code by design, developers can still insert custom Flutter code to extend app functionality.
  • Easy Deployment: Apps built on FlutterFlow can be exported to Flutter or deployed to Google Play and the App Store directly.

Xano:

  • User-Friendly for Backend Management: Xano is designed to simplify complex backend tasks like setting up databases, creating APIs, and managing cloud infrastructure.
  • Visual API Builder: Xano allows users to build APIs with a no-code approach, making backend development accessible to non-technical users.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features: While it’s relatively easy to get started, users who want to leverage Xano’s more advanced capabilities, like complex business logic or workflows, may experience a steeper learning curve.

Verdict: FlutterFlow is more straightforward for building front-end apps with its visual interface, while Xano offers a simple yet powerful backend experience but requires more learning for advanced features.

3. Design and Customization

FlutterFlow:

  • Highly Customizable UIs: FlutterFlow allows users to create highly customized and visually appealing user interfaces using Flutter’s design framework.
  • Component Library: FlutterFlow provides pre-built UI components, including buttons, forms, and charts, which can be customized to fit the needs of any application.
  • Responsive Design: FlutterFlow allows users to build responsive apps that work well on various screen sizes, both mobile and web.

Xano:

  • Backend Customization: Xano offers robust tools for customizing the backend of your app, including database schema design, custom API endpoints, and business logic workflows.
  • No Frontend Design Tools: Xano is purely focused on backend services, so there are no tools for designing user interfaces.

Verdict: FlutterFlow is perfect for designing and customizing front-end interfaces, while Xano focuses exclusively on backend customization and API creation.

4. Backend and Database

FlutterFlow:

  • Firebase Integration: While FlutterFlow itself doesn’t provide a backend, it integrates seamlessly with Firebase for backend services like authentication, database, and real-time data sync.
  • External API Integration: Users can connect to third-party APIs to bring in dynamic data, but complex backend functionality has to be managed through external services.

Xano:

  • Fully Managed Backend: Xano provides an out-of-the-box backend solution, complete with database management, user authentication, and server-side logic.
  • API Creation: Xano allows users to build custom APIs without writing code, which can be used by front-end platforms like FlutterFlow, React, or any other.
  • Scalable Database: Xano automatically manages database scaling, ensuring that the backend can grow with the needs of your application.

Verdict: Xano is the clear choice for powerful and scalable backend services, whereas FlutterFlow relies on external backends like Firebase or Xano for its backend functionality.

5. Performance and Scalability

FlutterFlow:

  • Powered by Flutter: Apps built with FlutterFlow use Flutter, known for its excellent performance across both Android and iOS. Apps are compiled to native code, ensuring fast and efficient execution.
  • Scalability of Front-End: While the front-end built with FlutterFlow can scale across devices, the scalability of the overall app depends on the backend service you use (e.g., Firebase or Xano).

Xano:

  • Highly Scalable Backend: Xano provides a serverless backend that scales automatically with your application’s needs. Whether it’s handling a few users or thousands, Xano is designed to grow with your app.
  • Performance Optimization: Xano takes care of server-side performance, ensuring fast API responses and efficient data handling, even under heavy loads.

Verdict: Xano is designed for backend scalability and high performance, while FlutterFlow provides excellent performance for front-end apps, with scalability depending on the chosen backend service.

6. Integrations and Extensibility

FlutterFlow:

  • API Integrations: FlutterFlow supports integration with third-party APIs, allowing developers to bring in data from external sources.
  • Firebase Integration: FlutterFlow offers out-of-the-box integration with Firebase, making it easy to add authentication, databases, and cloud functions.
  • Custom Code: Developers can extend the platform’s capabilities by inserting custom Flutter code.

Xano:

  • API-First Architecture: Xano enables users to create powerful APIs that can be consumed by any front-end platform (including FlutterFlow).
  • Webhooks and External Services: Xano can integrate with third-party services through APIs, making it flexible for use with a wide range of external systems.
  • Automation Tools: Xano supports workflow automation and complex business logic, providing flexibility in handling data and operations.

Verdict: FlutterFlow focuses on front-end integrations (APIs, Firebase), while Xano excels in creating APIs and integrating with third-party backend services, making it more extensible on the server side.

7. Pricing

FlutterFlow:

  • Free Plan Available: FlutterFlow offers a free tier with limited features, which is great for building simple apps or prototypes.
  • Paid Plans for Advanced Features: Pricing starts at $30/month for advanced features like custom APIs, exporting code, and deploying directly to app stores.

Xano:

  • Free Tier: Xano offers a free plan for small-scale projects, which includes basic API and database features.
  • Scalable Pricing: Paid plans start at $59/month, with pricing increasing based on the number of API requests, database size, and additional backend features needed for scaling.

Verdict: Both FlutterFlow and Xano offer free tiers, but Xano's pricing is structured around backend scaling needs, while FlutterFlow focuses on front-end features and app deployment.

Final Verdict

  • Choose FlutterFlow if you’re looking to build beautiful, responsive front-end mobile or web apps with a focus on visual design and seamless integration with Flutter’s capabilities. It’s best for teams focusing on UI/UX and app deployment without deep backend requirements.
  • Choose Xano if you need a scalable and robust backend platform for managing APIs, databases, and server-side workflows. Xano is ideal for teams or developers who want a managed backend service that can easily integrate with front-end platforms like FlutterFlow, React, or others.

In summary, FlutterFlow excels in front-end app design, while Xano offers a powerful, scalable backend solution for complex data handling and API creation. Together, they can be a great combination for building full-stack applications.

Pushing No-Code to Its Limits

Launching an app has never been more cost-effective and time-efficient. Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow have transformed the development landscape, enabling developers to create sophisticated applications rapidly.

Fast and Cost-Effective Launch

No-code platforms empower startups to launch their apps at lightning speed—often multiple times faster than traditional development—at a fraction of the cost. This agile approach helps startups focus on growth and innovation rather than high upfront development expenses.

Agile Iteration

For early-stage startups, quickly reaching a problem-solution fit is critical. No-code platforms allow rapid adaptation, letting you implement and push new features live in a matter of hours, not weeks. This flexibility means you can stay responsive to market needs and iterate on your product with ease.

Seamless Integration and Plugins

Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow come with built-in integrations and a wealth of plugins, giving you instant access to essential features and functionalities. Whether you're building a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) or scaling up, these platforms make it easy to connect with tools you need, from payments to analytics.

Version Control Made Simple

Launching new versions of your app has never been easier. No-code platforms provide flexible version control, enabling you to create save points, roll back to previous versions if needed, and experiment confidently

Geo George: Leading the No-Code Frontier

While no-code development can have limitations in performance and certain functionalities, Mayfly Ventures, led by CTO Geo George, is pushing past these boundaries. We specialise in building high-performance, highly scalable MVPs with advanced features, deep integrations, and native user experiences that feel polished and professional.

Geo has been at the forefront of low-code development, becoming one of the earliest adopters of Bubble.io in Australia. Over the past six years, he’s honed his expertise in low-code and no-code capabilities, training the Mayfly team to push these platforms to their full potential.

Book a free Growth Strategy Call

Geo

Startup mentor, product strategist, no-code wiz and PMF expert. Eclectic dance style.

Founding Partner

MUCUDU: deep integrations and AI wrapped in low code

Mayfly collaborated with the MUCUDU team to build a low-code MVP for their hospitality tech platform, which includes loyalty management, peer-to-peer monetary gifting, and Tab functionality. Beyond the standard integrations with Stripe, Apple, and Google for login and payments, we incorporated advanced integrations with Point of Sale systems like Doshii and AI-driven recommendations that personalize the dining experience.

With Mayfly Ventures, you get the speed and cost benefits of no-code, combined with the performance and functionality typically reserved for full-stack development.

VOLI Case Study: No-Code in Action

Before working with Mayfly, VOLI’s founder Charlie Crozier had approached 12 different development agencies. As a non-technical founder, Charlie struggled to get his app built and ready for users, with quotes ranging from $300,000 to $1 million. These high costs placed immense pressure on early capital raising.

“When we met Mayfly, both our budget and timeline were completely reevaluated. We were able to go to market at a fraction of the cost and time we had expected—without compromising on quality.”

—  Charlie Crozier, Founder

The Process:

Mayfly worked closely with VOLI through a series of workshops to deeply understand the product, its vision, and user needs. Leveraging no-code and low-code frameworks, we built an enterprise-grade app at a fraction of the cost quoted by other studios. Now in pilot testing, VOLI is preparing for release to 10 companies already on the waitlist.

Explore More Case Studies

Are you tackling a problem worth solving?

Let's chat opportunity!

Book a free Growth Strategy Call

No-Code Tools We Love

We use state of the art low code tools and push them to the limit to create performant, scalable, highly functional mobile web apps.

Bubble.io

A powerful no-code platform that lets you build fully functional web applications with drag-and-drop ease. Its flexibility allows you to design, develop, and launch complex apps quickly, without writing a single line of code.

Flutterflow

A platform designed for building mobile apps using Google’s Flutter framework, Flutterflow simplifies the development process while offering extensive customization, making it a go-to tool for responsive, high-performance mobile applications.

Xano

A no-code backend platform that gives you the tools to manage your database, set up APIs, and create scalable back-end solutions, all without the need for server-side programming knowledge.

Learn More About No-Code

Would you like a free product strategy call?

Let's chat opportunity!

Get in Touch

Get the Mayfly Way Template

Validate your idea, find your market, design feature sets and define your tech stack all with this free easy to use notion template.

Read our Blog

We talk about #no code #MVPs #product strategy #product market fit #fuck ups #founder stories